Opinion on skimmers
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 9:31 pm
I would like an honest opinion about skimmers.
My own experience: I owned a seaclone skimmer in which I thought worked decent for a 55 gal. It wasn't until I added a Kent Nautilus that I realized what I was missing. After this, I moved to a 190g setup. The nautilous still worked great, but I wanted more so I upgraded to a MR2. The MR2 was noisy but worked fantastic. After about a year, I purchased a ETSS 800 (clone). This skimmer produced the same amount of sklimmate as the MR2 (but darker) and used about 1/2 the pump power. It was also much much quieter. I also noticed the bubbles were much much smaller in the reaction chamber. I now have a couple of new ETSS models but have yet to try them out. I would like to know your experiences with skimmers.
Thanks for the opinions,
Jeremy
My own experience: I owned a seaclone skimmer in which I thought worked decent for a 55 gal. It wasn't until I added a Kent Nautilus that I realized what I was missing. After this, I moved to a 190g setup. The nautilous still worked great, but I wanted more so I upgraded to a MR2. The MR2 was noisy but worked fantastic. After about a year, I purchased a ETSS 800 (clone). This skimmer produced the same amount of sklimmate as the MR2 (but darker) and used about 1/2 the pump power. It was also much much quieter. I also noticed the bubbles were much much smaller in the reaction chamber. I now have a couple of new ETSS models but have yet to try them out. I would like to know your experiences with skimmers.
Thanks for the opinions,
Jeremy