Page 2 of 2
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 11:57 am
by Amphiprion
Awesome pics. Doesn't it seem funny that every time someone takes a pic, you always see Mare Tranquilitatis? I guess it because it is so big-makes the moon more photogenic, though. Very nice telescope. I wanted a Meade Telestar, but didnt like the reviews. I cant make out the brand of yours-I am sort of in the market to find a nice reflecting telescope-so let me know what brand and its pros and cons that you have noticed (want to spend under $600 for a decent one

)
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 8:29 pm
by danielmiller82
I guess I will throw in mine as well...
Took this with my cheapo $160 telephoto lense handheld...I really need a good tripod.
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 7:11 am
by sb1227
Excellent! I know what you mean about the tripod.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 8:12 am
by mykpoz
I just wish I could take the pictures of half the stuff I am able to see in my scope ;\
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:48 am
by Redfish
Buy a cheap imager.
I strapped my Cannon 20D to my el cheapo meade 60AT and several minute exposures and got some great nebula pictures. You don't see anything really until you do some post processing. If you get the post processing correct it is amazing what you can shoot. I will see if I can find them.
I copied something I saw on a photo forum.
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:55 am
by mykpoz
ya I know, its a matter of finding the money
actually, to get what i want, I need a different mount or scope, something that will allow me to do extended (10-40min) exposures, that will keep up with the earths rotation. I have done some small photography with the scope, but I cant see dumping money into it, when I need other things to complement and aid my normal viewing
have you bought a T adapter for your 60AT? or were you just using the 60T as a guide scope
and about the post processing you are right, its amaizing what comes out, but you can get better effect with longer exposures.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 11:19 am
by Redfish
Duh! I am stupid. I just realized you might not have an autotracking base.
I understand about the money thing. Astronomy and astrophotography is one of those deals you could dump a bunch of money into. I have too many hobbies already. As you saw the other day, my fish tastes have been running a little expensive.
I have not bought the t-adapter. I just saw the post on strapping the camera to the scope and letting it provide tracking. I used a 100-300 lense and a couple of minutes exposure. It was absolutely incredible what I ended up with.